Winter Patriot Community Blog

Why is Syria being attacked? There are lots of reasons and they have everything to do with israel and the bankers that own it. Few people realize that Jews can't buy land in israel. They can only lease it. This allows the Rothschilds, through the government, to control the land into the future. If they sold it to israeli Jews, it is always possible that the land could be sold on to Arabs, for instance. By leasing the land, the Rothschilds maintain power over it. And power and control is what it is all about once you have enough money to buy absolutely anything you want and have more money than anyone else. When you are king of the heap, what else do you want? What would make a worthy ambition for a family like the Rothschilds? To rule the world? I think so. And israel is clearly a tool for that ambition.

Israel refuses to declare where its borders are and as it periodically extends it borders, it is reasonable to believe that they intend to continue expanding.

Eretz Israel

We know about Eretz Israel and that it is an ambition held by many Jews in israel and elsewhere. It includes land belonging to Lebanon, Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Jordan and Saudi Arabia. So far israel has invaded Lebanon, Egypt (Sinai), Syria (Golan Heights), Jordan (the West bank) and Iraq (through its proxy, the US). Israel is now sponsoring the jihadi invasion of Syria. But, results wise, it has been a very mixed bag for israel up till now. While they still control the Golan Heights and Sheba Farms (Lebanon) and the West bank, they had to give back the Sinai to Egypt in a deal that guaranteed that Egypt would not attack them in the future. They have been kicked out of southern Lebanon by Hezbollah twice now and their jihadi servants are having a hard time hanging on to any gains in Syria.

In 2006 israel invaded southern Lebanon hoping to draw Syria into the conflict with the aim of then drawing in the US to support israel in attacking Syria and Iran as well because Iran has a mutual defence pact with Syria. But it all went pear shaped because Hezbollah managed to defeat israel all by themselves. So Syria was able to stay out of the conflict and denied israel and the US the excuse to attack it. Israel is now afraid of Hezbollah in Lebanon so in 2011 they chose to leapfrog over Lebanon and attack Syria directly, though using proxies; or patsies, if you like. So far, this proxy war strategy has kept israel safe from retaliation while it is bringing devastation to Syria and the Syrian people.

Obviously, Syria has land that israel wants but Syria's problems were compounded in 2009 when Bashir al-Assad announced his grand “Four Seas Strategy” plan to become an oil transit country linking Iranian and Iraqi oil to Syria's and then all of this going through Turkey to Europe. Notably left out of this scenario is israel who have oil transit (and control) ambitions of their own and they definitely do not include Bashir al-Assad. Although the plan involved using the Nabucco pipeline which is favoured by the West and also in trouble financially, it created a huge problem for Saudi Arabia and Qatar, too.

These two countries are ruled by Sunni Muslim elites over populations that are largely poor and Shiite. Syria's ambitious plan involved uniting three Shiite countries; Syria, Iraq and Iran. Together with Lebanon, these countries are known as the Shiite Arc stretching from the Persian Gulf to the Mediterranean. Not only would it give these Shiite countries much influence over Europe (the destination of all this oil and gas) but it would bring considerable wealth to them allowing them to expand their economy. And all this at the expense of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and also israel.

This new oil revenue would allow Iran, Iraq and Syria to improve the lot of their citizens and make it increasingly difficult politically for Saudi Arabia and Qatar who keep their largely a Shiite populations poor in order to better control them. No doubt, the ruling families in these two despotic countries saw this as a direct threat to their power and privilege. It was, indeed, an existential threat to them. So Syria had to be attacked to head off this “Four Seas” pipeline consortium proposed by al-Assad. The four seas, btw, are the Persian Gulf, Caspian Sea, the Black Sea and the Mediterranean.

Al-Assad was hoping this would bring technology, expertise, industry and employment to Syria and given that the Syrian government owned and controlled its own central bank (in contrast to the central banks of western nations that are owned or controlled by largely Jewish bankers) it could have financed a good deal of it interest free and without the usual capital restrictions holding it back.

I mentioned in the previous essay how Britain drew Germany into two world wars in order to prevent it leaping ahead of Britain technologically and economically. Now we see that same strategy used against Syria and for the same reason. The link between Britain, israel and this common strategy is the London jewish bankers, of course.

Israel likes to present itself as a wealthy and technologically advanced nation but the truth is it is insolvent. It lives only through the largesse of American and German taxpayers and always has. Over 10 years ago, it was estimated that israel had cost US taxpayers $1.6 trillion. Thats over $250,000 per israeli. In 2007 it was estimated to have cost every taxpayer in the US $23,240Goodness knows what those figures are today. Israel cannot survive economically on its own and this is why it is desperate to gain control of oil pipelines and eventually oilfields to provide an independent revenue stream. While they display no shame at living off Germany and the US, it is not without its risks for israel.

Israel is short of water, too. With Syria under israeli control, either directly or through proxies, Hezbollah will find itself without Syrian support and Iran will find it much harder to support and supply Hezbollah with Syria no longer being able to act as a conduit for the shipment of physical supplies of all sorts including armaments. With Hezbollah weakened, israel will feel more confident in attacking and occupying southern Lebanon once again and tapping the water resources of the Litany River (once again!).

Taking out Syria allows israel to advance to the Iraqi border next to the Kurdish area. Israel has been courting the Kurds for decades and the Kurds control the northern Iraqi oilfields. No doubt, the israelis (although more probably their banker owners) will offer to pipe and market the Kurds' oil through what used to be Syria and on to Haifa and the Mediterranean Sea. From there to Europe with a handsome profit and control over the oil supply to Europe which they will then use to extort concessions of all sorts at critical times.

Taking out Syria would also chop one of the legs out from under Iran as far as military support goes. It would also cripple their efforts to pipe oil and gas overland to the Mediterranean and on to Europe. That would leave Qatar in the box seat to supply its gas to Europe and eliminate the threat to the Saudis. So you can see that this trio of scheming elites are natural allies because they have a common mindset and a common political and economic enemy. Qatar can supply the money, israel can supply the planning and access to the control of the US political class and hence to the military and military equipment and Saudi Arabia can supply the foot soldiers. This is the making of the perfect storm that has been unleashed on Syria who wanted nothing more than peace and prosperity; the two things that bankers traditionally find anathema to their profits and power.

Though they may not be fully aware of it, Syria also poses an existential threat to the bankers in London and New York through having and controlling their own central bank making it imperative for the bankers to cripple Syria. But as this involves other countries including Russia and Iran, I will address this issue more fully in a later article.

Russia has supported Syria for decades. Syria has been a long time customer for military materiel and provides Russia with a small naval base at Tartus giving the Russian Fleet a re-fueling and re-provisioning facility in the Mediterranean. NATO would like to take this facility away from them. NATO controls the whole coastline of the Mediterranean Sea except for the Syrian coast. Russia has a very strategic interest in Syria remaining free of the control of the jewish bankers and the countries these bankers control or have great influence over. So when it was looking increasingly like the US was going to intervene in Syria, Russia placed its warships off the coast of Syria to protect it.

source

I mentioned in my previous essay how Russia shot down two missiles fired at Syria by the Americans from the Mediterranean. Russia has said it now has Syria under its 'nuclear umbrella' making it impossible for the US or israel to invade Syria without risking nuclear war. But the bankers are desperate to preserve their money system and to build israel as a viable economy and cannot give up their ambition for complete hegemony over the world. So they are now attacking Ukraine with the aim of having the naval base at Sevastopol Russia taken away from Russia and so making it harder for the Russian Fleet to operate in the Mediterranean and thus harder for them to protect Syria.

Russia also sees that Syria is a domino that the US/israel wants to push over to help topple Iran and Iran is a commercial partner with Russia in the energy business as well. No doubt, Russia and Iran have discussed piping oil from Russia under the Capsian Sea and through Iran to the Persian Gulf to be shipped throughout Asia.

But Iran is subject to a never ending stream of threats from the US and israel. So the next question is, “Why Iran?”