Snipers And A Chain Of Patsies: The who and why of the Kiev shootings.


Nuland and Yanukovich enjoying social intercourse photo source

Almost immediately after an agreement sponsored by the European Foreign ministers was signed by Yanukovych and the Ukranian opposition parties, shooting broke out. It made no sense and still doesn't . . . . . unless you are aware of a third and a fourth force involved. The third force is the German government, chief amongst the negotiating European powers. And the fourth is the jewish neocons of the US together with their co-religionists in the political and economic spheres in Ukraine itself. These two forces are in a struggle over their different desires for the outcome in Ukraine. But first, let us backtrack a little.

The Maidan protests were made possible by the Right Sector (variously described as 'fascists' and Nazis') >paying unemployed workers and students from the impoverished western region of Ukraine to go to Kiev and protest. They were bused in by Right Sector thugs. These same thugs were armed and accompanied the protesters to 'protect' them from the police, they said.

Who provided the money? It is reasonable to assume it came from the US$5billion mentioned by the jewish neocon, Victoria Nuland.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaR1_an9CnQ

A series of escalating violence from the protesters (chiefly the trained Right Sector thugs) ensued together with increasing concessions to the protesters from the Yanukovych government. Finally, Yanukovych agreed to an interim compromise government and an early election later this year. It was a capitulation and should have ended the violence then and there. But it didn't. It seemed instead to be a trigger for a shooting spree and armed takeover of the government. The following video has images of people being shot. So be prepard for this (or skip watching it).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5qXS8Xc274

So who ordered the shooting? And Why?

The Right Sector take their orders from the people who are paying them – the neocons. You'll notice that it is apparent from Ashton's mild reaction to the news that the snipers were brought in by the someone in the new unelected government and from her changing the subject straight away that she was fully aware of who the snipers were employed by-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xh_YkdGbWqk
To listen to the full conversation, go here-
http://vineyardsaker.blogspot.com.au/2014/03/intercepted-phone-call-betw...

And why? Because the jewish neocons do not want peace and they do not want people to have the time to consider what has happened with the protests that the neocons have orchestrated using a chain of patsies before the Ukranians vote for 'their' next government. When scaring a mark into signing something against their interests it is imperative to move quickly and rush them.

The protesters bused in from western Ukraine are clearly patsies. The violent Right Sector will also become patsies as they will carry the blame for the shootings if part of the truth eventually becomes mainstream. They will be in the way eventually, anyway. Here is what awaits them from someone who 'has been there, done that' (with these neocons)

Of course, the general Ukranian population in the west of the country are also patsies. Even the European politicians will become patsies as the Europeans and particularly the German population carries the economic cost of keeping a battered and raped Ukraine on economic life support into the foreseeable future as the oligarchs make off with the gold. The jewish forces around the world are also in a hurry to take over Ukraine because they are running out of time to secure their banking power base. But more on that later.

The deal brokered by the European Foreign Ministers suits Germany because it will leave the Ukraine relatively economically in tact (such that it is) and minimise the expense to Germany in keeping it afloat. It also heads off a confrontation with Russia upon whom the Germans rely on for natural gas to power their economy. The alternative is a rump Ukraine that will be an ongoing drain on resources for Europe. And this is now increasingly likely as events unfold. No doubt, they also can see that the days of the jewish banking system (which is the foundation of jewish banker and US power) are numbered. The BRICS nations (chiefly Russia and China) are in the process of undermining this jewish dominated money system. So Germany, which has come off so badly from previous world wars wants to avoid another one, naturally, but also wants to get out from under the yoke of this insidious money system and free of the US military which is still an army of occupation in Germany sixty years after WW11.

To achieve this, Germany needs to have a de facto alliance with Russia and to covertly counter the neocons plans while positioning itself and waiting for Russia and China bring down the international banking system. Achieving the deal with Yanukovich was part of that survival strategy.

Of course, the German deal did not suit the neocons at all. We know from this leaked conversation where the neocon, Nuland, said, “Fuck the EU” that they are at loggerheads. Germany wanted Klitschko as the head of the imposed government where Nuland wanted “our guy” Yats (Arseny Yatsenyuk). The reason Nuland wants 'Yats' in the premier position is because he is a jewish banker and therefore completely simpatico with the neocons' desire to loot Ukraine (again). The deal Yanukovych struck with the European foreign ministers at the behest of Germany rang loud alarm bells for the neocons and within hours they pulled the trigger, literally.

The jews had in place their special forces (This is a cover story to account for israeli troops at the protests) and other snipers and a plan to corral the protesters and police and shoot both sides to confuse and panic everybody including Yanukovych and seize power. And it worked. Cameras were in position, including with the snipers to record it all.

See this video to see how the victims were herded into a kill zone.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLxSlq_hJu8&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Unfortunately there are no subtitles but you will get the picture. Again, this has distressing images, so be warned.

It's not as if they haven't done similar things before. Every 'popular' or 'color' revolution has been accompanied by snipers shooting both sides. Starting with Moscow in '93 through Tunisia, Egypt, Damascus etc. So who was present in the Ukraine crisis and also involved in all the other civil disasters? Not Yanukovych or the Berkut or even the Right Sector. The US neocons were heavily involved in all these conflicts. Who has profited from all these bloody upheavals? Israel and jewish oligarchs and bankers.

Jewish oligarchs, bankers and politicians links etc.
http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Holodomor
http://irishsavant.blogspot.com.au/2014/03/ukraine-mist-begins-to-clear....
http://iamthewitness.com/Ukraine.html
http://rehmat1.com/2013/12/16/ukraine-besieged-by-jewish-lobby/
http://voiceofrussia.com/2014_02_13/Petr-Poroshenko-the-dark-horse-of-th...
http://yellowpage.in.ua/en/archives/57709

But why Ukraine and why now?

I mentioned that time is running out for the jewish bankers. I mentioned that China and Russia are undermining the Western (largely jewish) banking system. I'll delve more into this in a second part to this essay but but leading up to this, it is important to understand how the connection between Syria, Russia and Ukraine figures in all this.


source

The Crimean peninsular in Ukraine is host to the Russian Black Sea Fleet. And it is the Black Sea Fleet that is parked off the coast of Syria and is protecting Syria from attack from US naval forces. There has also been a little publicised missile confrontation between the US and Russia with Russia, with superior missile technology, winning hands down. This victory to the Russians prompted al-Assad to place his trust in them and give up his chemical weapons.

So for the US forces to attack and occupy Syria, it is necessary to get rid of the Black Sea Fleet and to do that (or at least heavily impede it) the neocons need to take away basing rights in the Crimea for the Russian navy. Hence the geopolitical goal of taking over Ukraine including the Crimean peninsular.

But the Russian Navy isn't going anywhere. The Crimean people with the support of Russia has secured it's territory from attack by the Right Sector thugs and wll be voting in ten days time on whether or not to join the Russian Federation.

The next challenge will be from the eastern and/or southern provinces of Ukraine who want to join Crimea. If southern Ukraine manages to break away from Kiev, then this will deny the remaining rump of Ukraine access to the Black Sea. This is something I'm sure Russia would like to see happen to deny NATO the opportunity of setting up a port close to the Crimea.

There is much agitation for independence in Donetsk in the eastern Ukraine -
see video

The protests will continue and the imposed govt in Kiev will have to respond. If the people of Donetsk can organise a referendum and also militia units to protect themselves then it has every chance of turning violent. If this comes about, then I think we can expect to see Russian military intervention.

I expect the neocons are running around trying to cobble together some sort of military force capable of looking the part and to give some sort of cover to NATO troops to be there to "advise and help" deal with a rebellious population. I'm sure the neocons will be thinking (hoping) that the presence of NATO troops will deter Russian intervention. But I don't think it will make a bit of difference. Putin has said repeatedly that he will protect Russian speakers and citizens. And what the neocons will simply not accept is that Putin does not bluff.

So I expect the Neocons/NATO/US (or the Anglo/American/Zionist alliance, if you like) will continue to lurch from one ill thought-out move to the next. Though I hope that NATO forces will back off or refuse to do the bidding of the neocons.

Here are a couple of informative podcasts. The first is Pepe Escobar interviewed by Ryan Dawson and the second is Ryan Dawson, in turn, being interviewed by James Corbett -
http://ancreport.com/podcasts/podcast.php?id=93
http://www.corbettreport.com/interview-836-ryan-dawson-looks-for-a-third...

Other links
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-03-05/behind-kiev-snipers-it-was-some...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLxSlq_hJu8&feature=youtube_gdata_player
http://malorus.wordpress.com/2014/03/07/trojan-horse-in-ukraiene/
http://rt.com/news/lavrov-kiev-government-radicals-618/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Amd4l0OtKkA&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Additional Links-
http://vineyardsaker.blogspot.com.au/2014/03/the-truthseeker-ngo-documen...

Thanks to McJ and "Penny For Your Thoughts" and "Vineyard of The Saker" blogs for some of the links. Much good reading at both sites

Next up, “Why Syria?”

Comments

Ukraine / Crimea

James,

Good reading you again smiling

When SHTF in this Ukraine caper it was so fast and furious it was hard to have time to think. One could barely keep on top of the 'current' escalations.

Even though I realized the importance of the Crimea and the Port, still didn't connect it like you have with zionist push in Syria. It all makes perfect sense once you laid it on the line as you did.

Hope you are right about the dollar take down. This has to end sooner rather than later, and yes, I know it will be painful but it's the only way to stop them and NATO.
No one can say they haven't been warned and given every chance to 'set things right' but it's just not their style.

Looking forward to your Syria article and you just named a couple of my other favorite blogs. smiling
karin

Hi Karen

Thanks for your thoughtful comment. I think that with all the information we have these days that it often gets harder to see the overall directon of things and get buried in detail.

Yes, con men always try to move fast before people have time to have a considered reaction. They play on the base emotions of fear and greed to drive people into a 'cattle press'. No wonder they regard us as animals.

The element of surprise is a vital factor in wars of any kind; or let's say, when exploitation is the goal. Caught off guard, too, would have been the people they used along the way to this putsch. Of course, the chosen suspects have had plenty of practice at this.

Putin appeared slow to act but Russia's interests were not immediately in danger. When he did act it was thoughtfully, which is important. But it is definitely "Game On" now and when the neocons and/or their patsies make a wrong move (and they will) he will quickly spring whatever trap he has planned for them without warning.

Regardless of whether people like Putin or not, one thing is clear about him; he is a man with guiding principles and a loyalty to Russia. This makes the decision process much simpler for him than for those of his opponents. They have no principles and are loyal to no country, so when faced with a setback, they have too many choices available to them. Then, like all bullies, its 'fuck everyone else' (including the EU smiling ) because they are driven only by self preservation and the grand plan invariably collapses.

After the Syria article, I'll try and get round to writing about what i alluded to that is underneath all this - the currency war.

McJ's picture

Great post and I loved the

Great post and I loved the picture with the caption, James! laughing out loud I guess we can now say for certain that Nuland "fucked" him along with, of course, Germany and the rest of the EU. She's been busy!

As always, you bring us the bigger picture tying in recent events in Syria with the strategic importance of the Black Sea fleet in Sevestapol, giving us a better understanding of why the familiar psychos engineered this 'revolution' and why the narrative pivoted so quickly to a focus on the Crimea. 

I read recently that Germany has decided to take a more active part in NATO's future military adventures - flexing a little muscle perhaps, moving out from under the boot? One can easily see how a more friendly alliance between Russia and Germany would be a worry for the jewish neocons. They would want to be nipping that in the bud.

I can't help but notice the scapegoat (right sector nazis) and sacrificial lamb (the unarmed protesters and indeed the Ukranian people) theme playing it self out, yet again. 

Look forward to more. smiling

I couldn't believe my luck

I couldn't believe my luck when I found that picture. My eventual comment was toned down somewhat from my immediate thought smiling

I would think that Germany is being pulled every which way by various factions at the moment. But I think it is clear that Merkel sees Germany's future to the east rather than the West which has done nothing but occupy and exploit Germany. Full marks to them at surviving and even thriving at times in spite of all this. One can imagine where they might be in a short while if they teamed with Russia in a common cause. I'm sure the British (which includes the London bankers, of course - the 'Anglo/Zionist' part of the alliance) are very alive to this. "Perfidious Albion" comes to mind!

They brought about two world wars to hobble Germany for fear of them getting ahead and dominating world trade. It's tragic that the bankers and their associated aristocrats end up killing so many people in their efforts to stay on top of other peoples and nations by holding everybody back in absolute and/or relative poverty. And all for their unholy dollar.

Speaking of 'unholy', you are spot on, McJ, in drawing attention to the blood sacrifice ritual aspect of what is happening in Ukraine. And it is far from the first time, too.

McJ's picture

Cry me a river

rolling on the floor laughing

 photo crimeaPutinObomber.jpg

"So here they are, the facts:
http://rt.com/news/russian-troops-crimea-ukraine-816/

1) A Russian naval presence in Crimea dates to 1783 when the port city of Sevastopol was founded by Russian Prince Grigory Potemkin. Crimea was part of Russia until Nikita Khruschev gave it to Ukraine in 1954.

2) In 1997, amid the wreckage of the USSR, Russia & Ukraine signed a Partition Treaty determining the fate of the military bases and vessels in Crimea. The deal sparked widespread officer ‘defections’ to Russia and was ratified by the Russian & Ukrainian parliaments in 1999. Russia received 81.7 percent of the fleet’s ships after paying the Ukrainian government US$526.5 million.

3) The deal allowed the Russian Black Sea Fleet to stay in Crimea until 2017. This was extended by another 25 years to 2042 with a 5-year extension option in 2010.

4) Moscow annually writes off $97.75 million of Kiev’s debt for the right to use Ukrainian waters and radio frequencies, and to compensate for the Black Sea Fleet’s environmental impact.

5) The Russian navy is allowed up to

- 25,000 troops,

- 24 artillery systems with a caliber smaller than 100 mm,

- 132 armored vehicles, and

- 22 military planes, on Crimean territory.

Ukrainian marines look at a Russian ship floating out of the Sevastopol bay on March 4, 2014 (AFP Photo / Viktor Drachev)Ukrainian marines look at a Russian ship floating out of the Sevastopol bay on March 4, 2014 (AFP Photo / Viktor Drachev)

6) Five Russian naval units are stationed in the port city of Sevastopol, in compliance with the treaty:

- The 30th Surface Ship Division formed by the 11th Antisubmarine Ship Brigade. Comprises the Black Sea Fleet’s flagship guard missile cruiser Moskva as well as Kerch, Ochakov, Smetlivy, Ladny, and Pytlivy vessels, and the 197th Landing Ship Brigade, consisting of seven large amphibious vessels;

- The 41st Missile Boat Brigade includes the 166th Fast Attack Craft Division, consisting of Bora and Samum hovercrafts as well as small missile ships Mirazh and Shtil, and 295th missile Boat Division;

- The 247th Separate Submarine Division, consisting of two diesel submarines – B-871 Alrosa and B-380 Svyatoy Knyaz Georgy;

- The 68th Harbor Defense Ship Brigade formed by 4 vessels of the 400th Antisubmarine Ship Battalion and 418 Mine Hunting Ship Division respectively.;

- The 422nd Separate Hydrographic Ship Division boasts the Cheleken, Stvor, Donuzlav and GS-402 survey vessels and hydrographic boats.

7) Russia has two airbases in Crimea, in Kacha and Gvardeysky.

Servicemen participate in a joint parade of Ukraine's Navy and the Russian Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol on Navy Day.(RIA Novosti / Vasiliy Batanov)Servicemen participate in a joint parade of Ukraine's Navy and the Russian Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol on Navy Day.(RIA Novosti / Vasiliy Batanov)

8 ) Russian coastal forces in Ukraine consist of the 1096th Separate Anti-Aircraft Missile Regiment in Sevastopol and the 810th Marine Brigade, which hosts around 2,000 marines.

9) Russian naval units are permitted to implement security measures at their permanent post as well as during re-deployments in cooperation with Ukrainian forces, in accordance with Russia’s armed forces procedures."

That's very funny, McJ.

That's very funny, McJ. And accurate too! The cartoon encapsulates Putin's attitude and behaviour towards the US. He is so not intimidated by them. He alone, it seems, has seen through the bluff and bluster of the United States. He sees their limits and weaknesses and their total reliance on the perception of power. They have power, of course, but cannot use it without severe harm to themselves. Even their sabre rattling brings a cost to them. The longer they persist, the more people see that the 'emperor has no clothes'. It is no longer a unipolar world.

Thanks for posting those facts, too. They give the lie to all the propaganda spewing out of the western press and the bought and paid for politicians. One can now see the real value of news outlets such as RT.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.