Winter Patriot Community Blog

source

Please see update at the foot of this article

This follows on from NJT's post below and from Penny of “Penny For Your Thoughts” who has put up a piece on the killing of 120 Syrian police and servicemen in Syria.

Penny makes some astute observations regarding the reports of this mass killing in the British newspapers and asks some pertinent questions. Many of the links in my post below come from Penny's article.

We know that the BBC and the Guardian act as mouthpieces for the government and their security services. The Voice of America was overtly established as a propaganda arm of the US government, for goodness sake. So these reports (linked above) will be deliberately misleading, at least, in one way or another.

We also know that the security services of the US, Israel and Britain are up to their armpits in these 'Arab Spring uprisings'

Yet, of all the possible scenarios mentioned in these reports, the possibility that the gunmen are foreign military or security services trained personnel is never mentioned. The staging and success of these operations sound much more like special forces troops than "armed gangs".

So I estimate that this is the purpose of these articles; to mislead readers as to the nature of these conflicts and to give the illusion of choice of suggested scenarios for the readers 'to make up their own mind' from but leaving the real scenario out and thus restricting "the field of view". In other words, we are being presented Hegelian Dialectic. A limited choice between wrong answers with prevailing voices pushing for a 'compromise' or amalgam of the proffered scenarios from which the truth is absent.

We also know that the gunmen in the mass slaughter are likely to be connected to Mossad/MI6/CIA. Snipers have turned up in Tunisia, Egypt and elsewhere at critical times to make matters far worse. The slaughter is designed to outrage everybody. A sure sign of a false flag operation. Their motive can only be to break down government control and so foment a coup to replace the established order with one that's more compliant with the agenda of international banking and their military arm, NATO. The fact that these gunmen were able to ambush police and security personnel indicates that they contacts and help from within the government agencies. Perhaps these 'helpful contacts' are poised to exercise a coup when the time is right.

In the case of Syria, they have been a thorn in the side of NATO and the bankers for a long time. Assad, Syria's President, is against NATO, and for Iran, Russia and China and for Syria not becoming a pawn of the globalists. He has to go. But he has a lot of popular support which has been frustrating his foreign enemies. So this support has to come under fire. A very obvious way to do this would be to turn the Syrian police against the protesters (for and against). This escalates the violence and so advances the case for NATO et. al. to intervene militarily for 'humanitarian' purposes.

The Guardian had a feature article written by a Fadwa al Hatem. Frankly, he looks way too much like a MI6 plant. The article would seem to have two aims, that i can see.

First it seems to be goading the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood. Castigating them for not falling completely into line with other sponsored opposition groups at a conference in Turkey (paid for by whom?).
"The conference came out with a statement refusing foreign intervention and proclaiming the integrity and inviolability of Syria’s boarders. “Everything must be done to preserve Syria’s unity and territorial integrity,”"

Either they are supremely naive or they think everyone else is. Check out the fearful images surrounding the participants. No pressure! And the teevee camera. This is a 'for the West' production.

source

Al Hatem, in his Guardian article, says the Egyptian Brotherhood mobilised massively in Egypt. They did not. They played a very low profile there indeed and slipped into the co-drivers seat once the people had managed to remove Mubarrak.

So it looks like the Brotherhood are being called out to mobilise the people in Syria and they are shying away from it demanding that Syria be a sectarian state which they must know would be unacceptable. it would totally wreck the image NATO wants to market to the gullible populations of the West in newspaper and teevee land.

So they're dragging their feet. This might be because the Muslim Brotherhood are not anywhere near as powerful and influential with the people as they make out. Indeed, as they make themselves out to be, no doubt, when they have their hand out for money from the CIA, Mossad & Friends.

In Egypt on Friday (May 27th '11) a huge crowd of protesters filled Tahrir Square and elsewhere again demanding the reforms they were promised. They also were chanting “Where is the Brotherhood? Here is Tahrir!” in response to the Brotherhood declaring its opposition to the demonstration and siding with the military.

The crowd obviously saw them as piss weak and they very probably are. They did not take a leading role in the demonstrations that started last January and seemed to only turn up when the tide had turned. No doubt they are trying to do the same thing again in Syria and are being called out on it this time by Fadwa al Hatem which would suit the purposes of MI6 et. al. very nicely, thank you.

The second thing that stands out in Fadwa al Hatem's article is the lengths he goes to establish the bona fides of the Youtube videos on Syrian protests.

"Young popular committees, deep underground in Syria, are liaising and organising among themselves. They are getting their voice to the outside world at a time when the Syrian regime is forbidding any foreign media from reporting in the country, and they have learned and adapted remarkably quickly. Grainy videos taken with mobile phones now include easily recognisable local landmarks, and the cameraman is careful to always state the date, time and location of the events being filmed. There is even a YouTube channel, Sham SNN, where videos are uploaded almost hourly and, it seems, carefully vetted to avoid hoaxes or irrelevant material being included."

I would guess that they are produced, or at the very least edited, by the usual suspects because they would. That's exactly the sort of thing they do. They are running this 'opposition' show in Syria so they would be putting out these sorts of videos. It stands to reason. So Fadwa al Hatem as just indicated himself as fronting for them by insisting that the videos should be seen as genuine.

Penny gives a link to the Telegraph (another MI6 mouthpiece) who have a video up supposedly of a Syrian riot policeman weilding a machete. There's no sound – handy – and it is taken by someone who is also dancing at the same time or perhaps having fit. The frame jumps all over the place and is very unconvincing. It's just too amateurish.

So where is all this going? Remember that NATO would dearly love to invade Syria for a long list of reasons and that has to be why they have troops and agents in there already fomenting turmoil. But Russia and China have denied the US and Britain the UN's approval for doing so. But we know that this hasn't stopped NATO in the past. So they need a heavy marketing campaign aimed at the public as they have done before. Kosovo, for instance. Not to mention Iraq!

Once the public is “demanding that something must be done”, then we will see the usual posturing and 'negotiating' amongst the usual suspects and they will reluctantly agree to invade. Our knights in shining armour. Our modern day crusaders.

The only problem for NATO (and the rest of the world) is that Syria has a mutual defence pact with Iran. And both Russia and China have said at different times that they would view an attack on Iran as an attack on themselves. Russia also had missile batteries in Syria manned by Russian personnel a few years ago and I doubt very much that they would have removed them.

UPDATE
From thenakedfacts

“The only way we get information is through the citizen journalists,” said Ammar Abudlhamid, a Syrian activist based in Maryland who was one of several Syrian exiles to help organize delivery of satellite phones, cameras and laptops into the country earlier this year. “Without them, we would not know anything.” ....
....., a Syrian activist based in Maryland who was one of several Syrian exiles to help organize delivery of satellite phones, cameras and laptops into the country earlier this year.

And just who is Ammar Abudlhamid? I'll let nysoulcontrolla, a commenter at Penny's tell you -

http://thenakedfacts.blogspot.com/2011/06/conspiracy-or-notneocon-think.html

(And who is Ammar Abdulhamid?) Ammar Abdul Hamid, a Syrian intellectual who works at ''Brookings Institute'' http://www.brookings.edu/scholars/fellows/aabdulhamid.htm (WHO IS BROOKINGS?ZIONIST THINK TANK,HEADED BY STROBE TALBOTT ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE AND PARTNER WITH SABAN CENTER(ZIONIST ISRAELI THINK TANK)...

He runs the office for the National Salvation Front...wich is ran by vice president Abdel Halim Khaddam Head of Syrian Muslim Brotherhood(see above)..

He also had... "Previous Position[s]: Visiting Fellow, Saban Center for Middle East Policy (2004) http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Ammar_Abdulhamid (who is saban center? ZIONIST PRO ISRAELI THINK TANK AND FRONT) http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Saban_Center_for_Middle_East_Policy

In August 2005 he talked at a conference titled Solidarity Twenty-Five Years On: Lessons in the Struggle for Freedom which was "Cosponsored by Freedom House http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Freedom_House (SOROS THINK TANK) Freedom House's work is linked to the "democracy promotion" efforts of the National Endowment for Democracy.
(Thank you, Nysoulcontrolla)

Quite an impressive rap sheet, no?!

See also Penny's "Turkey's role in Syria's destabilisation" for more